All Articles
Tech News10 min read

Microservices: When to Use Them and When to Avoid

Honest take on microservices architecture. Learn the trade-offs, when monoliths make sense, and how to migrate gradually.

T

TechGyanic

December 9, 2025

Microservices: When to Use Them and When to Avoid

I've seen startups adopt microservices way too early and struggle for months with infrastructure complexity. I've also seen mature companies stuck with monoliths that took hours to deploy. Here's a realistic guide.

The Microservices Promise

  • Independent deployment
  • Technology flexibility
  • Team autonomy
  • Isolated failures

The Hidden Costs

What nobody tells you upfront:

  1. Network complexity - Remote calls fail in ways function calls don't
  2. Data consistency - Transactions across services are hard
  3. Debugging - Tracing issues across 10 services
  4. DevOps overhead - Each service needs CI/CD, monitoring, logs

When Microservices Make Sense

✅ Large team (50+ developers) ✅ Multiple teams working on different features ✅ Diverse technology requirements ✅ Different scaling needs per feature ✅ Already have DevOps expertise

When to Stick with Monolith

✅ Small team (< 15 developers) ✅ New product still evolving ✅ Limited DevOps resources ✅ Tight timeline ✅ Simple deployment needs

The Modular Monolith

Best of both worlds for many teams:

src/
├── modules/
│   ├── auth/
│   │   ├── controllers/
│   │   ├── services/
│   │   ├── models/
│   │   └── routes.js
│   ├── orders/
│   ├── payments/
│   └── notifications/
├── shared/
│   ├── database/
│   ├── utils/
│   └── middleware/
└── app.js

Rules:

  • Modules can only import from shared
  • Modules communicate through defined interfaces
  • Each module owns its database tables

If You Do Go Microservices

Service Communication

Synchronous (REST/gRPC)

  • Simple request-response
  • Tight coupling
  • Cascading failures risk
// Order service calls Payment service
const payment = await fetch('http://payment-service/charge', {
  method: 'POST',
  body: JSON.stringify({ orderId, amount })
});

Asynchronous (Message Queue)

  • Loose coupling
  • Better resilience
  • Eventual consistency
// Order service publishes event
await messageQueue.publish('order.created', {
  orderId: order.id,
  userId: order.userId,
  total: order.total
});

// Payment service subscribes
messageQueue.subscribe('order.created', async (event) => {
  await processPayment(event.orderId, event.total);
});

Database Per Service

Each service owns its data:

order-service → orders-db (PostgreSQL)
product-service → products-db (MongoDB)
search-service → elasticsearch
analytics-service → ClickHouse

API Gateway

Single entry point for clients:

Client → API Gateway → Auth Service
                     → Order Service
                     → Product Service

Migration Strategy

Don't rewrite. Extract gradually:

  1. Identify bounded contexts
  2. Extract one service at a time
  3. Start with lowest-risk module
  4. Keep monolith running during transition
  5. Use feature flags for rollback

Essential Infrastructure

You'll need:

  • Container orchestration (Kubernetes)
  • Service discovery
  • Centralized logging (ELK/Loki)
  • Distributed tracing (Jaeger)
  • Metrics (Prometheus/Grafana)
  • Message queue (RabbitMQ/Kafka)

If this list seems overwhelming, you might not be ready for microservices.

Final Advice

Start with a monolith. Extract services when you feel the pain. The best architecture is the one your team can actually operate.

microservicesarchitecturesystem-designbackenddevops
Share this article
T

Written by

TechGyanic

Sharing insights on technology, software architecture, and development best practices.