All Articles
Tutorial7 min read

Git Merge vs Rebase: A Visual Guide

Keep your history clean. Why senior devs prefer Rebase and the Golden Rule of when NOT to use it.

T

TechGyanic

October 28, 2025

Git Merge vs Rebase: A Visual Guide

Git history tells a story. Merge is a non-fiction documentary (Messy, real/chronological). Rebase is a edited movie script (Clean, linear story).

Merge (git merge main)

Creates a "Merge Commit". Graph looks like a railway track. Pros: Non-destructive. True history. Cons: Cluttered history with "Merge branch 'main'" commits.

Rebase (git rebase main)

Moves your commits to the TOP of the main branch. "Pretend I started my work today." Graph is a straight line.

The Golden Rule

NEVER rebase a public branch. If others are working on your branch, rebase changes the history (hashes). Their code will break. Only rebase your private feature branch before merging to main.

How we do it

  1. Working on feature-A.
  2. main updates.
  3. git checkout feature-A
  4. git pull --rebase origin main (Pull main and replay my work on top)
  5. Resolve conflicts once.
  6. git push --force-with-lease

Result: A beautiful, linear history.

gitversion-controlcollaborationbest-practicesdevops
Share this article
T

Written by

TechGyanic

Sharing insights on technology, software architecture, and development best practices.